Blog

Partner Compensation

September 2008

There is an excellent article in the September 8 issue of Accounting Today by Marc Rosenberg.

  http://www.webcpa.com/article.cfm?articleid=28866&pg=ros

This article amplifies something I hear about regularly ie the lack of firm/partner goal setting,
evaluations and consideration of non production factors in determining partner compensation.

Below are a few of the key findings.

*Setting and achieving strategic planning goals is not usually part of the compensation process at the smaller firms.

*Partner evaluations are only performed in 50-75% of the larger firms and 28% of the smaller firms.

*Production metrics (book of business and billable hours) and formulas are the prevalent partner compensation method in smaller firms whereas more intangibles are considered in larger firms.

Not mentioned is another factor that was well documented in a recent PCPS study ie the lack of partnership agreements in a surprisingly large number of firms.

Lots of room for improvement here for sure. 

Robert Fligel

Let’s Connect

For a no-obligation consultation with absolute confidentiality. Isn’t it time we talked?

212-490-9700

rfligel@rf-resources.com

Free Updates

Join our e-mail list for exclusive alerts! Be the first to know:

  • Who’s selling?
  • Who’s buying?
  • Who’s hiring?
  • And much more!
Sign up now

Recent Partner Moves

Here is a sample of our recent partner searches. Average new compensation was around $400k

  • Tax and Audit SuccessorNYC

  • Business ManagementNYC

  • Tax - Large Local FirmNYC

More